ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Submandibular fossa depth in relation to the mandibular canal and alveolar crest: a retrospective cross-sectional CBCT study analyzing side-specific and sex-based variations.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accurate preoperative evaluation of mandibular anatomy is essential before placing dental implants safely in the posterior region, where the submandibular fossa and proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve present serious risks. A precise preoperative evaluation of the mandibular anatomy is essential. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the depth of SF using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and its correlation to the mandibular canal (MC) and alveolar crest (AC) in 200 adults (116 males, 84 females). Measurements were performed using the I-CAT Vision software and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was used for the confirmation of intra- and interobserver reliability. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlations, t-tests, linear mixed-effects models (to account for bilateral correlations), multivariable regression and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. When controlling for within-subject correlation, sex differences remained significant on the right (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.