Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799096›Full record

ArticleNational science review2026

Magma as a carrier of non-stoichiometric oxygen linking Earth's interior and atmosphere.

Yongjiang Xu, Haiyang Niu, Wim van Westrenen, Ruiheng Liu, Peiyan Wu, Ho-Kwang Mao, Yanhao Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yongjiang XuCenter for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China.
Haiyang NiuState Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, International Centre for Materials Discovery, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Wim van WestrenenLin Earth and Planetary Laboratory, Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-8885
Ruiheng LiuState Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, International Centre for Materials Discovery, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Peiyan WuCenter for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China.
Ho-Kwang MaoCenter for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China.
Yanhao LinCenter for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magma generation and transport govern planetary evolution. Although oxygen is the most abundant anion in Earth's silicate interior, its role in magma is conventionally ignored, with magma oxygen contents assumed to be simply fixed by cation stoichiometry. Here we show, using high-pressure and high-temperature experiments supported by molecular dynamics simulations, that silicate magma can incorporate substantially more oxygen than permitted by traditional valence-state constraints. Excess oxygen acts as a previously unrecognized volatile component, increasing in concentration from near zero at 1 atm to > ∼5 wt.% above 5 GPa, more than five times the maximum oxygen increase attainable in Earth's solid mantle through iron redox changes. As oxygen-rich magmas ascend and decompress, their capacity to retain excess oxygen decreases, driving the release of O

Indexed as

atmospheric oxygenationexcess oxygenhigh-pressure experimentsoxygen cycleoxygen-rich deep magmas

Identifiers

PMID42799096
PMCPMC13613983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.