ArticleACS omega2026
Melt Electrospinning of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Poly(ethylene oxide)/Poly(ethylene glycol) Blend: Effects on Structure and Cellular Compatibility.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to investigate the effects of the melt electrospinning process on the properties of ternary blend poly-(ε-caprolactone)/poly-(ethylene oxide)/poly-(ethylene glycol) (PCL/PEO/PEG) fibers. The utterly different morphology of the specimens before and after melt electrospinning acknowledges the significant effect of melt electrospinning on the sample's properties. However, it does not chemically alter the samples. The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images showed that PEO and PEG behave differently in the PCL matrix, producing distinctly different morphologies in the respective binary blend fibers. Differences in morphology also lead to differences in the crystallization behavior of the specimen. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) also reveal that although PEO and PEG are fundamentally the same polymer with different molecular weights, their behaviors in the PCL matrix are entirely different; PEG mostly remains in the amorphous state, while PEO can form its crystalline structure. Hence, the final morphology of the ternary melt electrospun fiber is a combination of the morphology of PCL/PEO and PCL/PEG binary blends. Preliminary biological tests showed that the porosity created by the removal of the PEO and PEG hydrophilic phases improved fibroblast metabolic activity, highlighting the potential of this system for further investigation in bone tissue engineering applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.