ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
From clinical records to community care: using real-world evidence in Ayurveda.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Astute observers of health systems are aware that worldwide there is a clinical trend toward integrative and personalized models. Ayurveda, inherently by its theory and practice, a personalized system of healthcare. Evidence from Ayurvedic clinical settings shows its effectiveness in managing chronic diseases; however, a lack of comprehensive multi-centric and retrospective clinical data hampers the credibility of Ayurveda within research circles. Traditional research, particularly Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), is deemed unsuitable for evaluating Ayurveda because these trials focus on standardized interventions and do not account for the personalized and multifaceted nature of Ayurvedic practices. This study intends to demonstrate that routine electronic medical record (EMR) data can effectively be transformed into actionable real-world evidence to support Ayurvedic management of chronic conditions. Methods: Analysis was done using digitized Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Practo Insta, from the Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Bengaluru (and IIHNO Indore). Five clinical areas were assessed: Cancer ( Results: Improvements were observed across all clinical areas. In oncology, global QoL increased by 17%, functional scores rose by 10%, and symptomatic burden dropped by 48%. In Oral Mucositis, at the primary 3-week endpoint 57.3% (51/89) of AGR patients achieved complete Grade 0 resolution versus 0% in PBMT. In Psoriasis, 76.3% of patients showed PASI improvement, and 92.1% reported better QoL. Diabetic participants exhibited noticeable reductions in blood glucose levels, with 85% reporting improved QoL. In infertility management, 58% of female participants successfully conceived within an average of 6 months, alongside improvements in secondary fertility and follicular parameters. Conclusion: Integrating Ayurveda into mainstream healthcare requires a decisive shift toward robust, data-driven evidence. Evaluating personalized, multi-component interventions solely through conventional RCTs is limited, making the systematic use of Real-World Data (RWD) both necessary and appropriate. Standardizing routine EMR data translates nuanced Ayurvedic assessments into quantifiable metrics, bridging the epistemological gap between ancient clinical wisdom and modern scientific rigor to build the long-term evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.