ReviewRSC advances2026
Coloration of nylon textiles with natural dyes: a critical review of recent progress, dye-fiber interactions, fastness, and functional performance.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Textile coloration is challenged by the use of petrochemical dyes, intensive auxiliary use, high water and energy consumption, and the production of complex effluents. Natural colorants offer renewable alternatives, but their environmental superiority cannot be assumed for durable synthetic fibers. Nylon requires dedicated evaluation because its amide backbone, terminal functional groups, semicrystalline morphology, and grade-dependent free volume make its dyeing behavior unlike that of other fibers. This critical review systematically searched Scopus and the Web of Science for English-language journal articles published during 2000-2026; screening and duplicate removal yielded 158 unique studies. The reviewed evidence supports chemical compatibility between nylon and several natural-colorant classes through ionic interactions, hydrogen bonding, dipole interactions, hydrophobic partitioning, coordination, and diffusion into amorphous regions. Acidic conditions commonly enhance uptake by protonating amino end groups, while crystallinity, free volume, temperature, pretreatment, and colorant aggregation control diffusion and fixation. Microwave, ultrasound, plasma, and enzymatic processing can improve extraction, mass transfer, surface accessibility, or mild fixation but are not inherently cleaner without quantified energy, chemical, and scale-up data. Adsorption and kinetic models are often statistically adequate yet mechanistically overinterpreted. Light fastness, extract reproducibility, wet durability, and retention of functional properties remain major weaknesses, while metallic mordants may conflict with cleaner-production objectives. Environmental inventories, toxicity, cost, and pilot-scale evidence remain substantially weaker than coloration data. By integrating nylon chemistry, processing, performance, sustainability, and industrial readiness within a structure-process-performance framework, this review identifies standardized extracts, repeated-use durability testing, environmental and economic assessment, and pilot validation as priorities for credible cleaner coloration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.