Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799029›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Overview of advances in anode electrode engineering for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries.

Anjana A, Manu U M Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anjana AManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal India Manu.patel@manipal.edu.
Manu U M PatelManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal India Manu.patel@manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0513-8766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur batteries are regarded as promising candidates for future energy storage owing to their high theoretical energy density and the abundance of elemental sulfur. Existing research has focused on optimizing lithium-sulfur battery cathodes, electrolytes, and other components, while the role of the anode remains equally critical in determining the overall cell performance, safety, and longevity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of strategies for addressing the challenges of lithium-sulfur battery anodes. It covers key approaches, such as artificial solid electrolyte interphase layers, electrolyte engineering, lithiophilic host design, current collector modification, and the development of solid-state electrolytes. Additionally, it offers a brief overview of digital modeling and intelligent control methods. This review discusses alternative anode materials, such as silicon anodes, silicon-graphite composites, and carbon-based systems, with an emphasis on their synergistic effects in improving stability and electrochemical performance. Recent advances in anode-free configurations are also highlighted, providing insights into pathways for achieving higher energy densities alongside enhanced safety. This review further evaluates the advantages and limitations of the current strategies and outlines future directions, focusing on scalable material design, robust interface engineering, and practical implementation. Overall, this work emphasizes the critical role of anode engineering in unlocking the full potential of lithium-sulfur batteries and provides insights for the rational design of high-performance and durable energy storage systems.

Identifiers

PMID42799029
PMCPMC13613650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.