ArticleACS omega2026
Gasoline Adulteration Analysis Based on Raman Spectroscopy and a Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality and safety of gasoline are critical for energy distribution and market regulations. Consequently, rapid and nondestructive detection methods based on spectroscopy combined with intelligent algorithms have garnered significant attention. However, existing approaches often separate adulterant identification and concentration prediction, limiting their application in complex adulteration scenarios. To address these limitations, this study develops an attention-based multi-scale convolutional neural network, termed Multi-Scale Attention Fusion Convolutional Neural Network, based on Raman spectroscopy, to jointly perform adulterant classification and concentration regression within a unified framework. Four adulteration systemsgasoline blended with methanol, ethanol, kerosene, and dieselwere constructed, and 1200 Raman spectra were collected across adulteration ratios ranging from 5% to 30%. The performance of the model was systematically evaluated via ablation studies and comparisons with various backbone networks. Additionally, the proposed model was compared with multi-task deep learning models based on ResNet18 and LSTM architectures. The results indicate that the proposed model achieves more stable performance in both classification and regression tasks. In the ablation study, the removal of the Feature Pyramid Network module led to a 1.25% decrease in classification accuracy and a 29.21% increase in root mean square error, underscoring its critical role in multi-scale feature representation. Traditional single-task models were also evaluated for comparison. A Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest were applied to classification tasks, while Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Partial Least Squares Regression were used for regression. Even with optimal variable importance in projection wavelength selection, the best-performing SVR model achieved an
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.