Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

When daily activities become digitally curated: a perspective through the model of human occupation.

Nevita Saha, Latika Pandey, Shefali Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nevita SahaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Yenepoya School of Allied Health Sciences, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Latika PandeyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Yenepoya School of Allied Health Sciences, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shefali ParmarDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Yenepoya School of Allied Health Sciences, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine-scrolling characterized by prolonged engagement with algorithmically curated social media content driven by intermittent rewards and personalized recommendations has emerged as a common pattern of digital behavior with potential implications for everyday occupations. Although dopamine-scrolling has been discussed in relation to psychological constructs, its influence on occupational participation has received limited attention. This perspective article draws on broader literature on Social Media Use (SMU) and applies the Model of Human Occupation to conceptualize dopamine-scrolling as an emerging occupational phenomenon. It proposes that prolonged engagement with algorithmically curated digital environments may reshape occupational participation by altering volitional processes and promoting passive occupational participation, shifting occupational identity towards performative occupational engagement, and contributing to occupational imbalance through the disruption or displacement of meaningful occupations, with potential consequences for health and wellbeing. This perspective reframes dopamine-scrolling as a phenomenon capable of reshaping occupational participation, occupational engagement, occupational identity and occupational balance. It also highlights the societal implications and recommendations for future research, occupational therapy practice, interdisciplinary collaborations and digital literacy initiatives aimed at promoting more intentional and meaningful patterns of digital participation. The concepts presented are intended as interpretive propositions requiring empirical validation across populations and contexts.

Indexed as

occupational disruptionoccupational imbalanceoccupational sciencesmartphone addictionsocial media usage

Identifiers

PMID42798967
PMCPMC13613265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.