ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Adverse events with monitored anesthesia care sedation in patients with stroke receiving mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation for mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients is considered safe. The association of MAC sedation with respiratory complications is not well studied. Objective: To evaluate adverse events among patients who receive MAC sedation for treatment of acute stroke with thrombectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of adverse events at a single institution between 2020 and 2024 was performed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified clinical covariates associated with the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Results: Among 348 patients treated for stroke with MAC, 310 had no adverse events. Univariate analysis showed patients aged 60-69 years were 3.23 times more likely to have an adverse event than patients <60 years old and >8 times more likely to develop acute respiratory failure. Multivariable analysis indicated smokers were 2.4 times more likely to have an adverse event (odds ratio [OR], 2.41; 95% CI, 1.01-5.72; p = 0.046). Patients aged 60-69 were >3 times as likely to require prolonged ventilation (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.12-12.6; p = 0.03). Patients with comorbidities were also >3 times as likely to require prolonged ventilation (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.49-7.95; p = 0.004). Age, sex, race, body mass index, stroke location, and stroke history were not associated with adverse events, ventilator use, or acute respiratory failure. Conclusion: MAC is a safe method for stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. Smoking, age 60-69 years, and some comorbidities increased odds of respiratory adverse events, underscoring the importance of preoperative risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.