ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Postoperative circulating tumor DNA in stage II colon cancer: biological rationale, clinical evidence, and unresolved challenges.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stage II colon cancer is clinically heterogeneous. Current clinicopathologic risk factors cannot accurately identify patients with residual disease after curative resection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as microscopic residual tumor burden that remains after curative-intent treatment and is not detectable by conventional imaging, and for postoperative risk stratification. Methods: This narrative review summarizes the biological basis, analytical approaches, and clinical evidence regarding ctDNA in stage II colon cancer. We particularly emphasize prospective studies and randomized controlled trials. Results: Postoperative ctDNA positivity is strongly associated with increased recurrence risk and provides superior prognostic stratification compared with conventional clinicopathologic factors. Prospective studies have demonstrated that ctDNA-positive patients experience substantially higher recurrence rates, with the GALAXY study reporting a hazard ratio of 11.99 (95% CI: 8.83-16.27) for disease-free survival among patients with postoperative molecular residual disease. The DYNAMIC trial demonstrated that ctDNA-guided management reduces adjuvant chemotherapy use without compromising recurrence-free survival. However, current evidence suggests an important asymmetry in clinical utility. ctDNA negativity may support treatment de-escalation. In contrast, ctDNA positivity has not yet reliably identified patients who benefit from treatment escalation. Conclusions: ctDNA constitutes a robust prognostic biomarker in stage II colon cancer and supports risk-adapted postoperative management. However, its predictive value for guiding treatment escalation remains unproven. Integration with clinicopathologic and molecular features is essential before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.