Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798896›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026

Cognitive ageing among older Latin American immigrants: current evidence and limitations.

Fabiana Ribeiro, Teresa Capitao, Ana C Teixeira-Santos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabiana RibeiroDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Teresa CapitaoDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Ana C Teixeira-SantosDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This review synthesises current evidence on cognitive function among older Latin American immigrants and identifies key factors associated with cognitive outcomes. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across five databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed quantitative studies, without language restrictions. Titles and abstracts of 188 records were screened, and nine articles were selected for full-text screening. Results: Overall, three studies met the inclusion criteria, all conducted in the United States of America and primarily involving Mexican-born older adults, revealing the limited geographic and ethnic diversity of the available evidence. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using standardised global cognition measures and compared with those of non-immigrant populations. These disparities were largely associated with socioeconomic disadvantages and lower educational achievements. Additional factors consistently linked to cognitive outcomes included gender, cardiometabolic health, country of origin, age at migration, and neighbourhood socioeconomic context. Conclusion: Evidence on cognitive ageing among older Latin American immigrants remains limited and geographically concentrated. Greater research diversity and more precise characterisation of immigrant populations are needed to better understand cognitive ageing and to inform equitable, culturally responsive policies and interventions.

Indexed as

ageingcognitionimmigrantsinequalitiesLatin America

Identifiers

PMID42798896
PMCPMC13613156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.