Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

An open-set hybrid CNN-TCN network for human action recognition with unknown action rejection in collaborative robot workspaces.

Yasir Abdullah R, Ignisha Rajathi G, Barakkath Nisha U, Johny Elton R

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasir Abdullah RDepartment of AI&DS, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ignisha Rajathi GManipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Barakkath Nisha UDepartment of CSE, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Johny Elton RDepartment of CSE, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Open-set recognition capability is becoming necessary for collaborative robots because actual shop-floor dynamics do not always correspond to the fixed action classes used during training. Misclassification of unknown human motions may lead to inappropriate robot responses, whereas reliable rejection enables safer supervisory control. Methods: An open-set human action recognition framework is developed by combining a spatial Convolutional Neural Network encoder with a Temporal Convolutional Network-based temporal aggregation module and an unknown-action rejection gate based on open-set scoring. The framework is evaluated on the NTU RGB+D 120 dataset using cross-subject and cross-view protocols with held-out action classes. Results: The proposed framework achieves 93.20% and 91.00% top-1 accuracy under cross-subject and cross-view evaluation, respectively, with corresponding Macro-F1 scores of 88.40% and 86.20%. For open-set detection, it achieves an AUROC of 0.938 and an AUPR of 0.750, with a 5.00% false acceptance rate for unknown actions and a 91.82% true known-action acceptance rate. The system operates at 15.0 ms per window and 66 fps on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB, with a model size of 42 MB. Discussion: The results demonstrate that calibrated unknown-action rejection can improve safety-aware human action recognition while retaining practical real-time performance for collaborative robot workspaces.

Indexed as

collaborative robotshuman action recognitionhybrid CNNopen set recognitiontemporal modelingunknown action rejection

Identifiers

PMID42798861
PMCPMC13613086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.