ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
An open-set hybrid CNN-TCN network for human action recognition with unknown action rejection in collaborative robot workspaces.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Open-set recognition capability is becoming necessary for collaborative robots because actual shop-floor dynamics do not always correspond to the fixed action classes used during training. Misclassification of unknown human motions may lead to inappropriate robot responses, whereas reliable rejection enables safer supervisory control. Methods: An open-set human action recognition framework is developed by combining a spatial Convolutional Neural Network encoder with a Temporal Convolutional Network-based temporal aggregation module and an unknown-action rejection gate based on open-set scoring. The framework is evaluated on the NTU RGB+D 120 dataset using cross-subject and cross-view protocols with held-out action classes. Results: The proposed framework achieves 93.20% and 91.00% top-1 accuracy under cross-subject and cross-view evaluation, respectively, with corresponding Macro-F1 scores of 88.40% and 86.20%. For open-set detection, it achieves an AUROC of 0.938 and an AUPR of 0.750, with a 5.00% false acceptance rate for unknown actions and a 91.82% true known-action acceptance rate. The system operates at 15.0 ms per window and 66 fps on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB, with a model size of 42 MB. Discussion: The results demonstrate that calibrated unknown-action rejection can improve safety-aware human action recognition while retaining practical real-time performance for collaborative robot workspaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.