ReviewOncology letters2026
Basis and prospects of radiotherapy combined with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (Review).
Review in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are important local treatments for solid tumors; however, they have notable limitations. RT can damage the surrounding normal tissues and vascular system, limiting the maximum dose that can be safely delivered to the tumor, and potentially contributing to local recurrence. Furthermore, RT courses are typically protracted and cannot easily be repeated in the same field. The efficacy of RT is also reduced in radioresistant cells, such as those in hypoxic niches or in specific cell cycle phases. By contrast, HIFU achieves non-invasive tumor ablation through focused thermal energy while sparing adjacent tissues. However, its use is restricted to tumors without air or bone in the ultrasound path, such as those in the liver or prostate. Currently, HIFU is primarily used for palliation and cannot eradicate subclinical diseases. Its optimal integration with other modalities remains unknown. A synergistic combination of RT and HIFU has been proposed to overcome these limitations. Preclinical studies have indicated that HIFU can effectively target radioresistant tumor regions, whereas RT can reduce tumor volume and alter the tumor microenvironment, thereby enhancing subsequent HIFU ablation. Some clinical research on cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic, prostate and bone metastases, suggests that this combined approach can improve outcomes such as pain relief, local control and survival, with a manageable safety profile. The present review summarizes the fundamental rationale and accumulates clinical evidence supporting the combined use of RT and HIFU, and discusses the current challenges and future directions for this integrated approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.