ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Association of finerenone with graded proteinuria improvement in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria >1 g/d: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current evidence for finerenone in T2DM with CKD is derived primarily from patients with microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria, and data in those with moderate-to-heavy proteinuria remain limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of finerenone on sustained graded improvement of 24h-UTP and its safety profile in T2DM patients with CKD and proteinuria >1 g/d. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with T2DM and CKD with proteinuria >1 g/d treated at hospital. Patients were divided into the finerenone group and the control group based on whether they received finerenone during the follow-up period. Proteinuria was graded as Stage 2 (1-3.5 g/d) and Stage 3 (>3.5 g/d). The primary endpoint was sustained graded improvement in 24h-UTP. The secondary endpoint was the percentage reduction in proteinuria from baseline at different timepoints. Propensity score weighting was applied to address baseline imbalances. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to assess the association between finerenone use and graded proteinuria improvement. A mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was employed to compare changes in 24h-UTP, eGFR, and serum potassium levels between the two groups. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia incidence. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in this study, comprising 53 in the finerenone group and 81 in the control group. Over 12 months, 28 patients (52.8%) in the finerenone group and 27 patients (33.3%) in the control group achieved sustained graded improvement in 24h-UTP. After propensity score weighting, finerenone use was independently associated with sustained graded improvement (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.47, P = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in time to sustained improvement between groups (Log-rank P = 0.026-0.033). MMRM analysis revealed a greater reduction in 24h-UTP in the finerenone group, while eGFR and serum potassium changes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: In patients with T2DM and proteinuria >1 g/d, finerenone increased the probability of sustained graded proteinuria improvement, shortened the time to improvement, and was not associated with a significantly increased risk of hyperkalemia over 12 months, although the interpretation of safety findings is limited by baseline differences in kidney function and concomitant medication use between groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.