ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Digital technology use among age-friendly community initiatives in the United States.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although studies have established the importance of various types of resources for age-friendly community (AFC) initiatives, there has been little research on digital technologies. This study explored the extent of, and contexts for, digital technology use among AFC initiatives in the United States. Research Design and Methods: This concurrent mixed-methods study used data from AARP's 2024 Survey of the National Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities (NAFSC) ( Results: Over 90% of survey respondents indicated using at least one technology, the most common being online survey platforms (65%), social media (64%), cloud-based video conferencing (57%), organizational websites (56%), and collaborative file sharing (54%). Initiatives later into the NAFSC program cycle, led by nonprofits or higher education, and with more sources of support, reported using a greater variety of tools. The qualitative analysis identified human capital, alongside the digital infrastructure and financial capital of collaborating organizations, as conditions for technology use and access. Shifting initiative circumstances, as well as perceptions of older adults' digital capacities and preferences, also influenced technology use. Discussion and Implications: Our findings support digital capital as a central component of the development and implementation of AFC initiatives in the context of organizational, network, and community conditions. We discuss how findings can guide future research to enhance the strategic use of technology toward greater AFC impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.