ReviewFrontiers in epidemiology2026
Climate-informed surveillance for climate-sensitive infectious diseases in Somalia: early warning systems, policy gaps, and preparedness priorities.
Review in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate variability is reshaping infectious disease risk through ecological, environmental, social, and health-system pathways. However, its operational implications remain insufficiently defined in fragile and conflict-affected settings. Somalia is a critical case because recurrent droughts and floods intersect with displacement, food insecurity, weak water and sanitation infrastructure, disrupted immunisation, livestock dependence, and constrained health-system capacity. This narrative review synthesises evidence on climate-sensitive infectious disease risks in Somalia, examines existing surveillance and early warning systems, identifies policy and implementation gaps, and proposes priorities for a climate-informed surveillance-to-action model for infectious disease control. The review distinguishes directly climate-sensitive infections, including cholera, malaria, dengue, and Rift Valley fever, from indirectly climate-amplified vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, diphtheria, and polio. While Somalia has important surveillance and early warning assets, including EWARN, IDSRS/DHIS2, FEWS NET, FSNAU intelligence, WASH monitoring, livestock signals, and community-based reporting, these streams remain insufficiently integrated into district-level risk assessment and pre-financed preparedness action. Therefore, the central challenge is not the absence of warning signals but the failure to convert them into timely, disease-specific, and accountable responses. We propose a surveillance-to-action framework based on multisource signal detection, integrated district risk assessment, disease-specific trigger decisions, early preparedness actions, and feedback, accountability, and learning. Closing Somalia's warning-to-action gap requires pre-agreed disease-specific triggers, One Health coordination, flexible anticipatory financing, strengthened district surveillance capacity, and equity-centred outreach to internally displaced persons, pastoralist and nomadic communities, zero-dose children, malnourished populations, and hard-to-reach areas. Climate-informed surveillance should be understood not merely as better data collection but as an anticipatory public health function designed to act before climate shocks become infectious disease emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.