Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798724›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

From innovation to implementation: expanding global access to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation.

Laith Alhuneafat, Omar Obeidat, Kevin Buda, Dina Mohammed, Samarth Goyal, Gaspar Del Rio Pertuz, Murad Almasri, Joerg A Reifart, Adam L Gottula, Paul Rees and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Laith AlhuneafatDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Omar ObeidatDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Kevin BudaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Dina MohammedSchool of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Samarth GoyalDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gaspar Del Rio PertuzDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Murad AlmasriDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Joerg A ReifartDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Adam L GottulaCritical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Paul ReesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Ilhwan YeoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jason BartosDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Tamas AlexyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Demetris YannopoulosDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Andrea M ElliottDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation are established therapies for advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Technological advances have improved outcomes, including randomized evidence supporting the use of temporary MCS, such as percutaneous ventricular assist devices, in selected patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock, alongside substantial gains in survival with contemporary durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Despite this progress, access remains highly inequitable. Although global transplant activity has increased in recent years, heart transplantation remains concentrated in a small number of regions; historically, approximately 90% of procedures have been performed in North America and Western Europe. Similarly, temporary MCS use is largely limited to tertiary care centers, while durable LVAD use is concentrated in high-income settings. These disparities reflect differences in health system capacity across infrastructure, workforce, regulation, financing, culture, ethics, longitudinal follow-up, and data systems, as well as variation in health-system investment, language access, health literacy, and the completeness of registry-based data capture. In many resource-limited settings, fragmented care pathways lead to a "bridge to nowhere," where temporary support is initiated without access to definitive therapy. In this narrative review with scoping methods, we examine global variation in access to MCS and heart transplantation, map patient care pathways, and organize barriers into key system domains. We further synthesize potential solutions and propose a practical implementation roadmap spanning regionalized shock systems, durable MCS referral and follow-up networks, donor management infrastructure, workforce development, health financing strategies, and registry-based quality improvement.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockextracorporeal membrane oxygenationglobal healthhealth equityhealth systemsheart transplantationleft ventricular assist devicemechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID42798724
PMCPMC13612946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.