ArticleEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
Bridging the Treatment Access Gap: Janus Kinase Inhibitors as First-line Advanced Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Resource-variable Settings.
Article in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have reshaped the pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), distinguished by oral dosing, ambient-temperature stability, immunity from anti-drug antibody formation, and a characteristically brisk pharmacodynamic onset, properties that collectively set them apart from injectable biologic agents. The epidemiological footprint of IBD is expanding at an accelerating pace across Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East, yet meaningful access to biologic therapies remains starkly uneven, constrained by coldchain dependencies, infusion-facility prerequisites, immunogenicity monitoring demands, and financial barriers. Prior reviews have been anchored to Western regulatory paradigms without examining the qualitatively distinct therapeutic roles JAK inhibitors could assume in resource-variable healthcare environments. This narrative review synthesizes comparative efficacy, tolerability, and logistical evidence for JAK inhibitors vs biologic agents and proposes a regionally grounded framework for their integration into the Euroasian IBD treatment pathway. Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed through March 2026, targeting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), network meta-analyses (NMAs), comparative effectiveness investigations, real-world cohort analyses, and contemporary clinical practice guidelines [American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 2025, American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) 2024-2025, and European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) 2025] addressing JAK inhibitors and biologic agents in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Endpoints of interest spanned clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, rapidity of symptomatic relief, and safety parameters encompassing herpes zoster reactivation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results: Multiple NMAs position upadacitinib at the apex for clinical remission induction in UC ( Conclusion: Within resource-variable Euroasian healthcare systems, JAK inhibitors may merit a substantially earlier position in the IBD treatment sequence than Western algorithms currently prescribe, by virtue of logistical attributes that circumvent the infrastructure constraints impeding biologic utilization. This review presents the first regionally anchored framework for deploying JAK inhibitors in clinical contexts where the operative decision is not between a JAK inhibitor and a biologic, but between a JAK inhibitor and the total absence of advanced therapy. Clinical significance: For gastroenterologists practicing throughout the Euroasian region under conditions of restricted biologic availability, limited infusion capacity, and absent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), this review furnishes an evidence-grounded rationale for deploying JAK inhibitors as first-line advanced therapy, supported by efficacy data, safety evidence, and pragmatic considerations tailored to resource-variable healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.