ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of risk perception on perceived benefits of generative artificial intelligence users-an empirical study based on university students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid the rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) into higher education, it remains unclear how the risk perception ability of university students, as a core group of users, is associated with their perceived benefits of Gen AI. To address this gap, this study develops an integrated theoretical framework drawing upon Cognitive Appraisal Theory (CAT), Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)/UTAUT2 to explain how different dimensions of risk perception differentially influence distinct categories of perceived benefits. Questionnaire surveys were conducted to collect valid data from 814 university students. Hierarchical regression analysis using SPSS was employed to examine the effects of demographic variables (gender, age, grade), Gen AI usage duration, and risk perception on perceived benefits. The results indicate that university students' risk perception of Gen AI is multidimensional, and different dimensions show significantly differential associations with perceived benefits. Specifically, security risk perception has a significant positive effect on academic assistance and skill development. In contrast, information risk perception exerts significant negative effects on psychological and emotional support, daily life, and leisure and entertainment benefits. Results of the threshold effect show that when college students' risk perception exceeds a certain threshold, the effect turns positive and significant, enhancing their perceived benefit. Based on these findings, it is recommended that related groups take actions to promote the development and application of Gen AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.