ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Translating
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalised medicine is an expanding area of medical research, in which patient-specific physiology informs clinical interventions. The personalisation of skeletal-based medical implants through 3D imaging and additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the likelihood of implant rejections. Currently, full-body computed tomography (CT) scanners obtain images at the limit of resolution of intricate internal bone architecture such as trabecular bone (Tb), which makes them difficult to map with precision in humans. Therefore, we have proposed the development of a 3D printing workflow which utilises scaled high-resolution micro-CT outputs that maintain bone topography in the final 3D print, specifically the retention of physiologically relevant trabeculae. In this study, we evaluate 3D model generation and rendering parameters that are necessary to maintain anatomical fidelity while ensuring printability. Meshing algorithm, computer-aided design (CAD) rendering tools, and the resulting surface tessellation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.