Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798587›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Neural Basis of Simple Arithmetic Processing in a Native and Second Language.

Vanessa R Cerda, Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni, Nicole Y Wicha, James R Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa R CerdaDepartment of Psychology and Communication, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-7462
Macarena Suárez-PellicioniDepartment of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-9561
Nicole Y WichaDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3379-0849
James R BoothDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-5611

Funding

Localizing arithmetic in the developing bilingual brainR21HD098878 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI WICHA, NICOLE YVONNE · 2020 to 2021
$435k
The effect of language experience on a bilingual's ability to process arithmetic and other memorized factsK00HD112280 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CERDA, VANESSA · 2023 to 2024
$172k
NICHD NIH HHS K00 HD112280NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD098878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typically, bilinguals learn multiplication facts in their native language (L1), resulting in a performance advantage for arithmetic in L1 compared to a second language (L2). This performance advantage has been shown to be greater for individuals with lower L2 proficiency, suggesting that an individual's language background may play a role in arithmetic processing. The current study aimed to determine whether adult learners of an L2 with limited L2 proficiency engage shared or separate cortical regions to process simple arithmetic across languages. Participants verified small (2 × 3) and large (8 × 9) multiplication problems in both languages, while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was acquired. Small problems are thought to engage verbal memory to a greater extent than less practiced, large problems. Participants verified problems faster and more accurately in their L1 than L2. fMRI data suggest that the language differences in performance were not driven by differences in recruitment of the storage of arithmetic facts, as we did not observe expected differences in the engagement of the superior and middle temporal gyri (STG/MTG) across languages. Instead, these adults differentially engaged the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) across languages, suggesting that language differences in behavior may have been driven by their ability to engage more effortful arithmetic retrieval processes in L1, but not in L2. Additionally, participants exhibited expected differences in brain activation based on problem size, where small problems engaged STG/MTG and IFG associated with verbal retrieval processes and large problems presented with correct solutions engaged quantity processes associated with parietal regions.

Indexed as

arithmeticbilingualismfMRIL2 expertiselanguage biaslate learners

Identifiers

PMID42798587
PMCPMC13612847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.