ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Neural Basis of Simple Arithmetic Processing in a Native and Second Language.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Typically, bilinguals learn multiplication facts in their native language (L1), resulting in a performance advantage for arithmetic in L1 compared to a second language (L2). This performance advantage has been shown to be greater for individuals with lower L2 proficiency, suggesting that an individual's language background may play a role in arithmetic processing. The current study aimed to determine whether adult learners of an L2 with limited L2 proficiency engage shared or separate cortical regions to process simple arithmetic across languages. Participants verified small (2 × 3) and large (8 × 9) multiplication problems in both languages, while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was acquired. Small problems are thought to engage verbal memory to a greater extent than less practiced, large problems. Participants verified problems faster and more accurately in their L1 than L2. fMRI data suggest that the language differences in performance were not driven by differences in recruitment of the storage of arithmetic facts, as we did not observe expected differences in the engagement of the superior and middle temporal gyri (STG/MTG) across languages. Instead, these adults differentially engaged the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) across languages, suggesting that language differences in behavior may have been driven by their ability to engage more effortful arithmetic retrieval processes in L1, but not in L2. Additionally, participants exhibited expected differences in brain activation based on problem size, where small problems engaged STG/MTG and IFG associated with verbal retrieval processes and large problems presented with correct solutions engaged quantity processes associated with parietal regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.