ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Evaluation of tip fold over in 1,575 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) surgery aims to achieve atraumatic electrode array insertion to preserve residual hearing and optimize outcomes. Tip fold-over, a mechanical complication during insertion, can compromise stimulation effectiveness and may require reinsertion or revision surgery. This study investigates the incidence, influencing factors, and diagnostic approaches for tip fold-over across a large patient cohort implanted with various CI electrode array designs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent CI surgery between 2013 and 2024 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg. Included electrode arrays were from Cochlear™ (Slim Straight [SSA], Slim Modiolar [SMA], Contour Advance [CA]), MED-EL (FlexSoft, Flex28, Flex26, Flex24), and Advanced Bionics (SlimJ, Mid Scala [MS]). Detailed reviews of surgical reports, intraoperative electrophysiological data, and postoperative imaging-evaluated independently by at least two reviewers-were performed. Diagnostic imaging modalities included cone beam computed and digital volume tomography (DVT). Results: Among 1,575 implanted ears, 13 cases of tip fold-over were detected, yielding an overall incidence of 0.83%. Notably, 10 of these occurred with precurved, perimodiolar arrays (SMA and CA, Cochlear™; MS, Advanced Bionics), while only 3 were found in straight lateral wall designs (SSA, Cochlear™). No tip fold-over events were observed with any MED-EL electrode arrays or with the SlimJ electrode array from Advanced Bionics. Intraoperative Transimpedance matrix (TIM) analysis and intraoperative X-ray reliably detected tip fold-over in cases with normal anatomy. Conclusion: Electrode array design significantly influences tip fold-over risk. A potentially higher incidence has been observed with perimodiolar electrode arrays compared with flexible straight arrays. The importance of intraoperative diagnostics is underscored in this study. TIM analysis and intraoperative X-ray imaging proved effective in detecting tip fold-over events in real-time, allowing for immediate corrective action and avoiding revision surgeries. This large-scale retrospective study confirms that tip fold-over remains a rare but significant complication in CI surgery, with a higher prevalence in precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays. This study emphasizes the need for ongoing vigilance across all CI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.