ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Treatment of an unresectable mucoepidermoid carcinoma with osimertinib.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a common salivary gland malignancy, yet no established systemic standard exists for unresectable disease, and response rates to conventional chemotherapy are low. Most MECs are driven by the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion, which induces amphiregulin (AREG) overexpression and an autocrine AREG-EGFR loop that hyperactivates EGFR independently of activating kinase-domain mutations, providing a rationale for tumor-agnostic EGFR blockade. Case presentation: A 72-year-old man presented with a slowly enlarging right submandibular mass, diagnosed as low-grade MEC of the floor of the mouth. The tumor was considered unresectable owing to anticipated functional and cosmetic morbidity, and radiotherapy was deferred because of extensive mandibular involvement. Comprehensive genomic profiling identified no high-tier actionable alteration and did not interrogate gene fusions. On the basis of the AREG-EGFR autocrine axis described in MEC, osimertinib 80 mg once daily was initiated. The patient achieved a 33% reduction in the longest tumor diameter, meeting RECIST 1.1 criteria for a partial response, with symptomatic improvement and only grade 1 toxicity. Osimertinib was maintained at 80 mg once daily throughout, with approximately seven and a half months of disease control before non-target progression prompted palliative radiotherapy, for a total of 13 months of continuous treatment on this tumor-agnostic strategy. The patient remained clinically stable at last follow-up. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first reported partial response to a third-generation EGFR-TKI in oral MEC. The case supports prospective evaluation of fusion-informed, EGFR-directed therapy in this rare malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.