Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798533›Full record

ReviewEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology

Artificial Intelligence in Cholangioscopy: A New Frontier for Indeterminate Biliary Strictures.

Ahmed Salman, Ahmed Marwan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed SalmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cairo University Kasr Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-0841
Ahmed MarwanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-1064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indeterminate biliary strictures remain difficult to diagnose because benign and malignant conditions may have overlapping clinical, radiological, and cholangioscopic appearances. Conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based sampling has high specificity but limited sensitivity, often leading to repeated procedures or prolonged follow-up. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) improves assessment by enabling direct visualization and targeted biopsy, but its accuracy remains limited by operator-dependent interpretation, variable image quality, interobserver variability, and sampling error. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning-based image analysis, may enhance cholangioscopy by supporting real-time malignancy prediction, identifying suspicious mucosal and vascular features, guiding targeted biopsy, standardizing reporting, and assisting training. Early studies suggest that AI models can differentiate malignant from benign biliary strictures using digital cholangioscopy images and recognize features, such as tumor vessels, papillary projections, nodularity, ulceration, and mass-like mucosal change. However, AI-assisted cholangioscopy remains at an early stage. Current evidence is limited by retrospective designs, selected image datasets, small sample sizes, variable reference standards, and limited external validation. Prospective multicenter studies using real-time video are needed to determine whether AI improves diagnostic yield, reduces false-negative biopsies, and shortens time to diagnosis. At present, AI should be viewed as an adjunct to expert cholangioscopic assessment, histology, imaging, and multidisciplinary review rather than a replacement.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCholangiocarcinomaCholangioscopyDeep learningIndeterminate biliary stricture

Identifiers

PMID42798533
PMCPMC13612725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.