Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798532›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of public health2026

Artificial intelligence and computational methods in the Asia-Pacific pharmacovigilance landscape: a systematic review.

Gita Kusnadi, Grace Wangge, Arif Perdana

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gita KusnadiMonash University (Indonesia), Bumi Serpong Damai, Indonesia.
Grace WanggeMonash University (Indonesia), Bumi Serpong Damai, Indonesia.
Arif PerdanaMonash University (Indonesia), Bumi Serpong Damai, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in pharmacovigilance across the Asia-Pacific and identify reported methodological implementation challenges. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched using terms related to artificial intelligence, computational signal detection, pharmacovigilance, and Asia-Pacific countries. Peer-reviewed original studies published in English were included. PRISMA 2020 guideline was followed. Results: We included 64 studies in 14 countries primarily focused on 1) Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) identification, 2) ADR prediction and risk factor modelling, 3) Drug safety, monitoring, and evaluation, 4) Predictive modelling, and 5) Data information management. Machine Learning (ML) techniques were the most commonly applied AI methods in pharmacovigilance, followed by natural language processing, deep learning, neural networks, and symbolic and explainable AI. Disproportionality analysis methods were also commonly used across studies. Some challenges reported were relevant to data quality issues, generalizability, clinical workflow integration, implementation technicalities, and cultural barriers. Conclusion: To overcome the challenges of AI application in the Asia-Pacific, a tiered implementation strategy can be employed through establishing a regional collaboration framework and taking into account disparities in technological maturity across countries.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePharmacovigilanceAsiaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansAIartificial intelligenceAsia-pacificdrug safetypharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID42798532
PMCPMC13612370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.