ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
The influence of muscle mass on the coordination required for efficient movement.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle efficiency decreases with increasing size, largely due to a relative decrease in its mechanical output. Muscle mechanical output depends on its activation, strain, and strain rate and thus varies between different muscles within a limb during locomotion. Distinct muscle coordination patterns are required for efficient cycling, and so we would expect that the coordination patterns for efficient cycling or indeed locomotion would change across animal sizes. We tested whether muscle coordination would change with muscle size using data derived from human cycling: this paradigm allowed for controlled changes in both crank torque and cadence, allowing the multifactorial problem of muscle power output to be decomposed. We used kinematic and pedal data from 12 cyclists undergoing steady pedalling at cadences from 80 to 140 r.p.m. and generated musculoskeletal simulations of their movements. We introduced novel multisegment muscle models in the simulation that incorporated the internal muscle mass and thus accounted for the scaling effects of muscle tissue inertia. We solved the simulations for the muscle activity that was required to minimise the metabolic cost during cycling for each condition. The masses of the muscle models were scaled across five orders of magnitude. The predicted muscle activations were classified by Principal Component analysis to identify whether the coordination of muscle activity was modulated across models with different sized muscles. Analysis of variance revealed significant changes in coordination at the large-scale factors. This study shows how the coordination may be influenced by muscle inertia under scaling scenarios due to the non-linear effects of the inertial mass within the muscle tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.