Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798409›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Recovery-phase symptoms after COVID-19 infection and anxiety levels among college students.

Du Guo, Tao Liu, Yajing Xu, Luze Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Du GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Tao LiuAcademy of The Zhouhuaminzu Community, Lishui University, Lishui, China.
Yajing XuCollege of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Luze XieSchool of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the relationship between physical symptoms during the recovery phase after COVID-19 infection and anxiety levels among college students, with the aim of providing empirical evidence for post-pandemic mental health screening and health management in universities. Methods: The study used online survey data collected from college students in March 2023. After excluding straight-line responses, 394 valid questionnaires were retained. Among 372 students with a clear infection status, we examined the association between confirmed COVID-19 infection and anxiety. Among 298 students with confirmed infection, we further analyzed the associations of the number of physical symptoms during recovery, recovery time, and specific physical symptoms with anxiety. Results: Confirmed COVID-19 infection itself was not significantly associated with a higher anxiety level. Among infected students, however, the number of physical symptoms during recovery was positively associated with higher anxiety levels, whereas recovery time was not significantly associated with anxiety level. Analyses of specific symptoms showed that memory decline and chest pain were significantly associated with higher anxiety levels. Conclusion: Post-infection mental health screening in universities should not focus only on whether students have been infected. Greater attention should be paid to the burden of physical symptoms during recovery. Symptom count, cognitive changes, and chest discomfort may serve as useful supplementary indicators for post-infection follow-up and psychological risk identification.

Indexed as

anxietycollege studentsCOVID-19 infectionmental healthrecovery-phase symptoms

Identifiers

PMID42798409
PMCPMC13612414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.