ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Multimodal deep learning integrating ultrasonographic and clinical data for enhanced rotator cuff tear identification.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography (US) represents a practical and accessible imaging modality for rotator cuff tear (RCT) evaluation, yet diagnostic accuracy remains constrained by operator experience and the sonographic ambiguity of partial-thickness tears. Deep learning (DL) models applied to US imaging and machine learning models derived from clinical variables have each demonstrated independent promise, yet their integration within a unified diagnostic framework has not been systematically explored. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal DL model integrating US imaging with structured clinical examination data for RCT detection. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 947 patients presenting with shoulder pain who underwent both shoulder US and MRI was partitioned into training and testing sets at a 7:3 ratio. Patients with MRI-confirmed supraspinatus RCT were designated RCT-positive, while those with supraspinatus tendinopathy or subacromial bursitis were designated RCT-negative. Four model configurations were developed: a clinical-only model, a single-view US model, a dual-view US model, and a full multimodal model (MM) combining dual-view US with clinical variables through feature-level fusion. All models were trained using five-fold cross-validation and evaluated on the testing set for discriminative performance, calibration, and clinical utility. Model interpretability was assessed using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) for the image encoder and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for the clinical encoder. Results: Among 947 patients, 370 (39.1%) were RCT-positive and 577 (60.9%) were RCT-negative. MM achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.935, with sensitivity of 0.946, specificity of 0.786, and F1 score of 0.830, significantly outperforming all unimodal configurations. Decision curve analysis confirmed superior net benefit of MM across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Grad-CAM heatmaps demonstrated anatomically coherent attention within the supraspinatus tendon, while SHAP analysis identified the drop arm test, external rotation lag sign, and empty can test as the dominant clinical predictors. Conclusion: The proposed multimodal DL framework offers a validated and interpretable tool for MRI-independent RCT diagnosis, with potential applicability in resource-constrained clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.