Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The effect of anchor attraction on the buying behavior of carbon labeled agricultural products: incorporating anchor attraction into TPB.

Fei Wang, Nan Wang, Dehua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fei WangSchool of Finance, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.
Nan WangChina School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China.
Dehua ZhangSchool of Finance, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon emissions from agriculture can be reduced by adding carbon labels on agricultural products. The growing trend of live streaming agricultural products is a significant tool for promoting low-carbon consumption. We investigates the influence of anchor attraction on consumer purchases of carbon-labeled agricultural products by including it in the theory of planned behavior. A total of 402 questionnaires were gathered via the Hangzhou resident questionnaire survey, and they were examined using a structural equation model. The findings show that attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and anchor attraction all have a direct impact on consumers' intentions to buy carbon-labeled agricultural products. Purchase intention and perceived behavior control have a direct impact on purchase behavior. Purchase intention is significantly influenced by anchor attraction indirectly through attitude, perceived behavior control, and subjective norms. Product knowledge plays a moderating role in the relationship between purchase intention and actually purchase behavior, and low product knowledge can better promote the transformation from intention to behavior, which may be related to the current state of implementation of China's carbon labeling system. This study develops a novel theoretical framework and, in a sense, makes up for the lack of attention paid to anchor attraction's effect on consumers' decisions. Our findings not only help mitigate carbon emissions from agricultural production, but also help guide low-carbon consumption and achieve carbon neutrality.

Indexed as

anchor attractionbehavioral choicecarbon labeled agricultural productsenvironmental psychologySEM

Identifiers

PMID42798348
PMCPMC13612271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.