Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Externally validated explainable machine learning for postoperative recurrence prediction in early-stage NSCLC.

Fatih Kemik, Hayri Kağan Gören, Bahadır Köylü, Cevat İlteriş Kıkılı, Nazan Demir, Berna Karataş, Salih Duman, Kadir Burak Özer, Suat Erus, Berker Özkan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fatih KemikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Hayri Kağan GörenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Bahadır KöylüDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cevat İlteriş KıkılıDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nazan DemirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berna KarataşDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Salih DumanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Kadir Burak ÖzerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Suat ErusDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berker ÖzkanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Serhan TanjuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Şükrü DilegeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Fatih SelçukbiricikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative recurrence remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pathological TNM staging does not fully capture within-stage heterogeneity. We aimed to develop and externally validate an explainable machine learning model for recurrence prediction after curative resection. Methods: This retrospective study included 723 patients with stage I-II NSCLC, including 52 recurrences, with independent external validation in a separate cohort (n=50). A Random Forest model using routinely available clinical and pathological variables was developed within a nested cross-validation framework and compared with logistic regression. Performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC, calibration, Decision Curve Analysis, and SHAP-based interpretation. Results: The Random Forest achieved a mean internal ROC-AUC of 0.70 versus 0.64 for logistic regression, although no formal paired statistical comparison was performed. In an independent case-control external validation cohort with an artificially balanced outcome distribution, the Random Forest achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.83); the balanced design precluded assessment of calibration or absolute risk at natural prevalence. Sigmoid recalibration of pooled out-of-fold predictions yielded an apparent Brier score reduction to 0.063, although post-calibration performance was not independently evaluated. Decision Curve Analysis demonstrated positive net clinical benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. SHAP analysis highlighted tumor size, pathological T stage, and STAS among the principal tumor-related predictors, whereas fold-level analysis showed greater stability for tumor size, tumor necrosis, and STAS. Complementary time-to-event analyses accounting for right censoring included 715 patients and 44 recurrence events. Conclusion: An explainable machine learning model based on routinely available variables demonstrated promising but preliminary discrimination in an independent case-control external validation cohort. Larger consecutive cohorts with natural outcome prevalence are required before clinical application.

Indexed as

early-stage lung cancerexternal validationmachine learningpostoperative recurrencerandom forest

Identifiers

PMID42798335
PMCPMC13612256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.