ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Metaplastic breast cancer: a clinicopathological analysis of nine cases highlighting diagnostic challenges and aggressive behavior.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and highly heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer associated with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We aimed to characterize the clinical features, pathological findings, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with MBC. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included nine patients diagnosed with MBC at Hanzhong Central Hospital between January 2016 and July 2025. Clinical data, pathological features, treatment regimens, and follow-up outcomes were comprehensively reviewed. Results: Patient ages ranged from 26 to 76 years, with tumor diameters ranging from 1.5 cm to 7.0 cm, presenting as irregular hypoechoic masses on ultrasound. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the majority of cases (7/9, 77.8%) were triple-negative; one case (11.1%) was ER-low positive, and one case (11.1%) converted to HER2-positive following neoadjuvant therapy. All patients underwent mastectomy, with some undergoing additional lymph node dissection and radiotherapy. The most common metastatic sites were the liver and brain. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 15.7-28.4 months), five patients (55.6%) died from distant metastasis. Discussion: Preoperative diagnosis of MBC remains challenging and relies heavily on postoperative pathological examination. In this single-center series of nine patients, we observed aggressive clinical behavior characterized by a high rate of distant metastasis (liver and brain) and a short-term mortality of 55.6% (five of nine) at a median follow-up of 24 months. However, three patients remained disease-free, and one was alive with metastatic disease at the last follow-up, reflecting the heterogeneous clinical outcomes of this disease. The small sample size and the absence of molecular profiling preclude definitive conclusions regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Our findings underscore the diagnostic complexity, pathological heterogeneity, and urgent need for multicenter collaborative studies with integrated genomic characterization to guide future therapeutic strategies. The molecular data on PIK3CA mutation frequencies and targeted therapeutic approaches discussed in the context of the literature are derived from published studies and were not investigated in our cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.