ArticleOxford medical case reports2026
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis after pharyngeal fish bone impaction: a case report.
Article in Oxford medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is an uncommon but severe complication of deep neck infection. Most cases arise from odontogenic sources, whereas pharyngeal fish bone impaction is rare. We report the case of a 54-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who developed DNM 10 days after endoscopic removal of a fish bone lodged in the right vallecula. Flexible nasofibroscopy showed a residual vallecular mucosal lesion with marked supraglottic oedema, and contrast-enhanced cervicothoracic CT demonstrated extensive cervical infection with mediastinal spread. The patient underwent emergency cervicotomy with cervical and mediastinal drainage through a cervical approach, followed by broad-spectrum antibiotics, tracheostomy, and intensive care. He improved gradually with multidisciplinary care. This case underscores the need for early recognition, urgent surgical drainage, and coordinated management, especially in patients with poorly controlled diabetes, even after apparently successful foreign body removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.