ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Therapeutic hybrid intelligence with neural and knowledge-based expert reasoning for SRS: an AI model for breast cancer brain metastases.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prescription dose selection for breast cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery remains largely guided by tumor size, anatomical constraints, and institutional practice rather than individualized tumor-specific estimates of local failure. We developed THINKERS-Breast, a mixture-of-experts artificial intelligence framework for personalized dose evaluation after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center tumor-level study of breast cancer brain metastases treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Variables available before or at treatment were used to train a mixture-of-experts neural network with discrete-time survival modeling. Margin dose was incorporated as a queryable input to enable repeated candidate dose evaluation. Internal validation used grouped 5-fold cross-validation and a grouped holdout test split by patient. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 12-month local failure, mean absolute error (MAE) for expected time to local failure, Brier score, and calibration metrics. Results: The cohort included 3,098 tumors from 504 patients. In grouped cross-validation, THINKERS-Breast achieved raw mean AUC >0.807 and calibrated mean AUC of 0.864 for 12-month local failure. Raw and calibrated Brier scores were <0.14 and <0.16, respectively, with calibration intercepts ranging from -0.31 to +0.27. In the grouped holdout set, AUC was 0.781 (95% CI, 0.704-0.857), and MAE for expected time to local failure was 1.55 months (95% CI, 0.78-3.42). Conclusions: THINKERS-Breast provides an internally validated framework for tumor-specific local failure prediction and dose-policy evaluation after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastases. External validation is required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.