Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798289›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026

Serum GFAP and Age Accurately Distinguish AQP4-IgG Positive and Double Seronegative NMOSD From MOGAD After a Recent Attack.

Manon Rival, Fabien Rollot, Sabine Laurent-Chabalier, Romain Casey, Illiasse El Bahi, Guillaume Brocard, Romain Marignier, Sophie Trouillet-Assant, Sandra Vukusic, Agnès Fromont and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Manon RivalIGF, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.
Fabien RollotUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-2331
Sabine Laurent-ChabalierLaboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie Clinique, Santé Publique Innovation et Méthodologie (BESPIM), CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Romain CaseyUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5918-9261
Illiasse El BahiUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Guillaume BrocardUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Romain MarignierService de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-2800
Sophie Trouillet-AssantInternational Center of Research in Infectiology, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR 5308, ENS, UCBL, Lyon University, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6439-4705
Sandra VukusicUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Agnès FromontDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
David Axel LaplaudService de Neurologie, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, CIC INSERM 1413, CRC-SEP Pays de la Loire, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Guillaume MatheyDepartment of Neurology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5747-9169
Elisabeth MaillartDépartement de Neurologie, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7699-0328
Laure MichelNeurology Department, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, CIC_P1414 INSERM, MOBIDIC_U1236, University Hospital, Rennes University, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8119-7794
Aurélie RuetDepartment of Neurology, MS Center, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-8739
Pierre LabaugeMS Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Xavier AyrignacINM, INSERM, Département de Neurologie, CRC Sclérose en Plaques, CRMR LEUKOFRANCE & Centre d'Investigation Clinique U1411, CHU de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-2981
Hélène ZephirCHU Lille, CRCSEP Lille, Univ Lille, Lille, France.
Jonathan CironDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Toulouse, CRC-SEP, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-6308
Jérôme de SèzeDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Investigation Center, CIC 1434, INSERM 1434, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-7578
Arnaud KwiatkowskiDepartment of Neurology, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-0137
Caroline PapeixDepartment of Neurology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-6125
Pierre BrangerDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Caen, MS Expert Centre, Normandy University, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-9502
Christine Lebrun-FrenayNeurology, UR2CA_URRIS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur2, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-2416
Eric BergerService de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Pierre ClavelouDepartment of Neurology, INSERM NeuroDol U1107, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CRC SEP Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Olivier HeinzlefDepartment of Neurology, CRC Sclérose en Plaques IDF Ouest, Hôpital de Poissy, Poissy, France.
Jean PelletierService de Neurologie, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, APHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9730-7567
Abdullatif Al-KhedrDepartment of Neurology, CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France.
Olivier CasezDepartment of Neurology, Neurology MS Clinic Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-5302
Bertrand BourreDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.
Alain CréangeDepartment of Neurology, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3838-1622
Thomas DavidDepartment of Neurology, CHU de la Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0133-3274
Laurent MagyDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Limoges, Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1784-2901
Jean-Philippe CamdessancheDepartment of Neurology, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Hôpital Nord, Saint-Étienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5282-6707
Inès DoghriCRC SEP, Department of Neurology, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4701-7966
Amélie Dos SantosDepartment of Neurology et Centre d'Investigation Clinique, CIC INSERM 1402, CHU La Milétrie, Hôpital Jean Bernard, Poitiers, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-3873
Thibault MuraLaboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie Clinique, Santé Publique Innovation et Méthodologie (BESPIM), CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-1336
Hanane AgherbiService de Neurologie, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Eric ThouvenotIGF, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-7747
OFSEP Group and NOMADMUS Investigators

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-COHO-002Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation against multiple sclerosisNovartisObservatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum neurofilament-light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) activity. This study aimed to identify patient- and disease-level determinants of sNfL and sGFAP and to evaluate their ability to support differential diagnosis in neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

methodssNFL and sGFAP levels were measured in 640 patients from the OFSEP cohort (88 NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies [AQP4-NMOSD], 28 double-seronegative NMOSD [DN-NMOSD], 61 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease [MOGAD], 64 clinically isolated syndrome [CIS], 237 relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS], and 162 primary progressive MS [PPMS]). The association between log[sNFL] and log[sGFAP] and age, sex, time since relapse, EDSS, oligoclonal bands, and MRI characteristics was analyzed by multiple linear regression. The diagnostic performance of sNfL and sGFAP in discriminating between NMOSD and MS subgroups was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsFor each group, specific associations of sNFL and sGFAP levels with patient characteristics were observed. Clearest associations were observed in AQP4-NMOSD patients. After a recent attack (≤ 90 days), multivariate analysis revealed that sGFAP and age discriminated AQP4-NMOSD from MOGAD (AUC = 0.939 [0.910;0.982]), AQP4-NMOSD and DN-NMOSD from MOGAD (AUC = 0.863 [0.776;0.977]), and AQP4-NMOSD from all other groups (AUC = 0.950 [0.918;0.987]). Diagnostic probability heatmaps based on sGFAP and age illustrate the probability of each diagnosis relative to others for bedside interpretation.

conclusionAfter an acute attack of NMOSD, risk score based on sGFAP and age may guide the management of patients before autoantibody status is available.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinMyelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated DiseaseNeurofilament ProteinsNeuromyelitis OpticaAdultAge FactorsAutoantibodiesBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunoglobulin Gneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsbiomarkersMOGADmultiple sclerosisNMOSDsGFAPsNfL

Identifiers

PMID42798289
PMCPMC13615407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.