ArticleMedicine2026
Associations among grazing behavior, emotional eating, and psychological well-being in university students: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the associations among grazing behavior, emotional eating, and psychological well-being and to identify variables statistically associated with emotional eating among university students. A descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational design was employed. Data were collected from 540 students between May and July 2025 through face-to-face interviews using a personal information form, the Grazing Questionnaire, the Emotional Eating Scale, and the Psychological Well-Being Scale. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations, were calculated. Sociodemographic differences were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and 1-way analysis of variance, while relationships between scales were examined with Pearson correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify variables statistically associated with emotional eating. Of the participants, 71.9% (n = 388) were female. On average, students reported low levels of grazing behavior, exhibited emotional eating behaviors, and demonstrated moderate levels of psychological well-being according to scale scores. A significant positive correlation was found between grazing behavior and emotional eating, whereas psychological well-being was significantly negatively correlated with emotional eating. In the regression model, grazing behavior showed the strongest positive association with emotional eating. The model including grazing behavior, psychological well-being, body mass index, and gender explained 36.6% of the variance in total emotional eating scores. These findings suggest that university-based counseling programs, public health initiatives, and psychological support interventions may help address grazing and emotional eating behaviors among students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.