ArticleMedicine2026
Predicting 90-day mortality in patients with HBV-ACLF: A comparison of machine learning models and logistic regression.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by a high short-term mortality rate. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major cause of ACLF in the Asia-Pacific region. This study aimed to compare the performance of multiple prediction models and identify a stable approach for predicting 90-day mortality in patients with HBV-associated ACLF (HBV-ACLF). Clinical data from 577 patients with HBV-ACLF admitted to 2 hospitals were retrospectively collected. Among them, 513 patients from 1 hospital were randomly divided into a training cohort and a testing cohort at a ratio of 6:4, while 64 patients from another hospital were included as an external validation cohort. Six prediction approaches were evaluated, including logistic regression (LR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The RF model achieved excellent discrimination in the training cohort, with an AUC of 1.000. However, its performance declined in the testing cohort and external validation cohort, with AUC values of 0.912 and 0.728, respectively. In contrast, the LR model demonstrated more consistent predictive performance across the training, testing, and external validation cohorts, with AUC values of 0.905, 0.928, and 0.849, respectively. Overall, the LR model showed more consistent point estimates of discrimination across the internal testing and external validation cohorts than the more complex models. Although several machine learning approaches demonstrated good predictive performance, the LR showed the most stable and consistent performance across the testing and external validation cohorts. These findings suggest that increased model complexity does not necessarily translate into superior generalizability and that simpler, more interpretable models may provide robust prognostic prediction for patients with HBV-ACLF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.