ArticleMedicine2026
Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotator cuff injury (RCI) is a common age-related musculoskeletal disorder, yet public awareness remains limited. With short-video platforms emerging as key health information sources, concerns about content quality have grown. This study evaluated the quality, reliability, and comprehensiveness of RCI-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili and examined the impact of uploader characteristics. On October 13, 2025, Chinese-language videos containing "rotator cuff injury" were retrieved from TikTok and Bilibili. Following strict inclusion criteria, 231 videos were analyzed. Video characteristics, engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, collections), and uploader information were collected. Quality and content integrity were assessed using the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), Global Quality Scale (GQS), and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN). Statistical comparisons and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. Of 231 videos, 96 were from Bilibili and 135 from TikTok. TikTok videos were shorter (median 93 seconds vs 234.5 seconds, P < .001) but demonstrated higher engagement across all metrics (P < .001). Physicians contributed most content (TikTok: 79%, Bilibili: 64%). Diagnosis and treatment dominated, while epidemiology and prevention were rarely addressed. GQS and mDISCERN scores did not differ between platforms. TikTok scored higher on VIQI information flow (P < .001) and visual quality (P = .044); Bilibili excelled in information accuracy (P = .006). Individual user videos showed slightly higher GQS (P < .05) and accuracy (P = .033); physician videos received more comments (P = .002) and shares (P = .042). VIQI and GQS correlated positively with engagement metrics (VIQI: R = 0.21-0.40; GQS: r = 0.20-0.28; all P < .001), whereas mDISCERN showed weak associations. Video duration correlated positively with quality scores (GQS: r = 0.56; VIQI: R = 0.34; mDISCERN: r = 0.33; all P < .001) but negligibly with engagement. The analysis of RCI-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili reveals moderate content quality and a significant lack of preventive information. These findings underscore the need for strategies to enhance the scientific rigor and comprehensiveness of health information on short-video platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.