ArticleMedicine2026
Causal relationship between genetically predicted white blood cell count and systemic lupus erythematosus: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observational studies have suggested an association between white blood cell (WBC) count and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the causal relationship remains uncertain because of potential confounding factors. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to investigate the causal effect of WBC count on SLE risk by using genetic instruments. Genetically predicted higher WBC counts were associated with a reduced risk of SLE (inverse-variance weighted [IVW]: odds ratio = 0.384, 95% confidence interval = 0.160-0.920, P = .031; weighted median: odds ratio = 0.326, 95% confidence interval = 0.124-0.859, P = .023). MR-Egger regression revealed no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (intercept, P = .705), and MR polygenic residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) detected 4 outliers. After outlier removal, heterogeneity decreased, and the IVW and weighted median estimates remained significant (beta = -0.96, P = .03; beta = -1.12, P = .023, respectively). We conducted a 2-sample MR analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European ancestry: WBC count (GWAS ID: ieu-b-30, N = 563,946) and SLE (GWAS ID: ieu-a-815, 14,267 cases, and 43,047 controls). Sixty-five independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (P < 5 × 10-8, clumped at r2 < 0.001) were selected as instrumental variables, with a mean F statistic of 28.6, indicating strong instrument strength. Analyses were performed using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with the TwoSampleMR and MR-PRESSO packages. The primary analytical methods included IVW, weighted median, and MR-Egger regression. Sensitivity analyses included Cochran Q test for heterogeneity, MR-PRESSO outlier correction, and leave-one-out validation to ensure robustness. This MR analysis supports an independent causal protective effect of genetically predicted higher WBC counts on SLE risk. These findings should not be extrapolated as evidence for therapeutic leukocyte elevation, nor do they alter the clinical management of leukopenia observed in active SLE or during immunosuppressive therapy. The genetic signal likely reflects broader immune homeostatic regulation rather than lineage-specific effects, the mechanistic basis of which warrants dedicated functional investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.