ArticleMedicine2026
Post-marketing safety of ensifentrine in COPD: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study using disproportionality analysis of FAERS/AEMS reports.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensifentrine is a newly approved inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because post-marketing safety experience is still limited, this study evaluated adverse event reporting patterns for ensifentrine. Quarterly US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System/Adverse Event Monitoring System files from 2024Q3 to 2026Q1 were analyzed. Duplicate reports were removed using Case Identification Number (CASEID), FDA receipt date (FDA_DT), and Primary Identification Number (PRIMARYID), and the primary analysis was restricted to reports in which ensifentrine was recorded as the primary suspect drug. Preferred Terms (PTs) were mapped to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities primary System Organ Class categories, and report-level disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, an information component approximation, and an observed-to-expected approximation. After deduplication, 2,831,030 records were reduced to 2,500,712 unique reports. Ensifentrine was identified in 1137 reports across all drug roles and in 823 primary-suspect reports, which included 1817 PT records. At the System Organ Class level, Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders was the only category meeting all predefined robust signal criteria. At the PT level, respiratory, cardiovascular, psychiatric/neuropsychiatric, and product quality- or medication-use-related terms were notable. Time-to-onset could be calculated for 139 reports, with a median of 12 days. Respiratory reporting patterns predominated in early post-marketing reports for ensifentrine. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating pharmacovigilance signals rather than estimates of incidence or causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.