ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Student Perceptions of Fee Policies in Veterinary Medicine: An Ethical and Professional Identity Framework.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the perceptions and attitudes of final-year veterinary students regarding the Official Minimum Fee Schedule established for veterinarians in Türkiye, within a multidimensional framework. The research was conducted with a total of 216 final-year students enrolled in veterinary faculties in Türkiye. Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of Likert-type items. The construct validity of the scale was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and its reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. The study found that the majority of students considered providing services below the official minimum fee schedule to be ethically inappropriate and reported that professional organizations play an important regulatory and supervisory role in this regard. In terms of demographic variables, no statistically significant differences were found in factor scores based on gender, income level, university, level of education, or internship experience. However, significant differences were identified in the dimensions of regulatory-deontological attitudes and price transparency based on place of residence. In conclusion, attitudes toward the minimum fee schedule in veterinary medicine are shaped not only by legal knowledge but also by ethical values, professional socialization processes, and institutional norms. These findings highlight the importance of addressing fee policies in veterinary education together with their ethical and professional dimensions, as well as strengthening the awareness-raising role of professional organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.