ArticleViruses2026
Balancing Genome Plasticity and Evolutionary Constraint During the Long-Term Evolution of Feline Coronaviruses.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feline coronaviruses (FCoVs) are evolutionarily dynamic alphacoronaviruses whose diversification has been driven by extensive genetic exchange and long-term adaptation. However, how genome plasticity is balanced with the evolutionary constraints required to maintain viral fitness remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed 127 complete FCoV genomes collected worldwide over more than five decades to investigate the evolutionary processes governing long-term FCoV diversification. Genome-wide phylogenetic analyses resolved three major evolutionary lineages and demonstrated that the two recombinant lineages originated independently through recombination between feline and canine coronaviruses, highlighting repeated interspecies recombination as a recurrent source of genomic innovation. In contrast, gene-level evolutionary analyses revealed substantial discordance with whole-genome phylogenies, indicating that individual genomic regions have followed distinct evolutionary trajectories. Recombination and positive selection were concentrated within a limited subset of genes, particularly NSP3, NSP12, NSP2, and the spike gene, suggesting that evolutionary innovation preferentially targets proteins involved in virus-host interactions. Despite extensive genome restructuring and adaptive diversification, overall dinucleotide composition remained highly conserved across all lineages, with persistent CpG suppression and continued CpG depletion during the long-term evolution of the predominant GI lineage, revealing strong compositional constraints acting on FCoV genomes. Together, these findings support a multi-scale model of coronavirus evolution in which recombination reorganizes genome architecture, adaptive evolution refines genes at the virus-host interface, and long-term genomic constraints preserve fundamental compositional features. This work provides a conceptual framework for understanding how genome plasticity and evolutionary constraint are balanced during the long-term evolution of FCoVs and offers broader insights into the evolutionary organization of alphacoronavirus genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.