ReviewToxics2026
Technology-Related Trace Elements in Paediatric Scalp-Hair Biomonitoring: Biomarker Validity, Environmental Relevance, and Implications for Risk Assessment.
Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technology-related trace elements (TTEs), including rare earth elements (REEs), platinum-group elements (PGEs), silver, antimony, bismuth, barium, strontium, vanadium and radionuclide-associated elements, are increasingly relevant to environmental exposure assessment. Children and adolescents are important sentinel populations, and scalp hair offers a non-invasive matrix for multielement analysis. However, a reported hair concentration may combine follicular incorporation, sweat and sebum deposition and external particles, and may also be influenced by collection, washing, cosmetic treatment and analytical contamination. Separately, left-censoring and the statistical treatment of non-detects can materially affect population summaries and comparisons. This critical narrative review integrates paediatric, occupational, environmental and multimatrix evidence through a structured evidence matrix and an element-by-element audit of biomonitoring assessment values. Hair can identify spatial contrasts and source-related patterns, but current evidence generally does not support direct inference of absorbed dose or clinical risk. In long-term occupational REE exposure, urine shows stronger exposure-response performance than blood; paired hair-urine data for thorium discriminate exposed groups without establishing quantitative equivalence; antimony findings vary by exposure setting; and barium biomonitoring equivalents are available for urine and plasma, but not hair. No health-based guidance values validated specifically for paediatric scalp hair were identified for any of the target TTEs. A seven-stage weight-of-evidence framework is proposed, positioning hair as a complementary screening and hypothesis-generating matrix within multimatrix assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.