Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797731›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

From Blast to Biological Uptake: Residual Dinitrotoluene as an Occupational Exposure Hazard in Explosive Ordnance Disposal.

Gareth Collett, Kelly Johnstone, Tim Bashford, William Proud, Mia Tazi, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Richard T Bryan, Bryan G Fry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gareth CollettFaculty of Ordnance, Munitions and Explosives, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Swansea SA1 8EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-2739
Kelly JohnstoneOccupational Hygiene & Exposure Science Lab, School of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-6435
Tim BashfordSchool of Applied Computing, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Swansea SA1 8EW, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-2095-0546
William ProudCentre for Active Resilience and Security (CARS), Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 4AZ, UK.
Mia TaziTransforming Cancer OUtcomes Through Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-1443-856X
Mieke Van HemelrijckTransforming Cancer OUtcomes Through Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Richard T BryanBladder Cancer Research Centre, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-4293
Bryan G FryAdaptive Biotoxicology Lab, School of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-1283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated mixed-munition demolition may require explosive ordnance disposal personnel to re-enter a common demolition pit to inspect effects, recover debris and prepare subsequent stacks. Dinitrotoluene (DNT) is a recognised explosive ordnance occupational toxicant absorbed by inhalation, skin and ingestion. Urinary-tract malignancies and other adverse outcomes have been reported in highly exposed nitroaromatic-explosives workers. Recently, bladder-cancer incidence was documented as elevated among former British Army ammunition technicians. While these observations do not establish a causal relationship with DNT, they however provide a strong rationale for further investigation of credible exposure pathways. This study developed a scenario-based source-pathway-receptor model to examine whether residual DNT could constitute an occupational exposure source during these tasks. This model was applied to an explosive ordnance disposal operation involving 20 sequential demolitions and a documented aggregate TNT-equivalent basis of 1000 kg, used as a screening proxy because the operational inventory was predominantly TNT-filled. The model identified plausible primary inhalation from a blast-generated plume and secondary inhalation from resuspended residues, together with dermal and incidental-ingestion pathways. An important caveat is that it does not reconstruct individual dose or establish disease causation. Validation requires time-resolved post-blast and task-based personal air sampling, surface assessment, biomonitoring and detailed exposure reconstruction during representative demolition operations. As such, this study establishes crucial foundational hypotheses for future occupational hazard research into DNT exposure to explosive ordnance disposal personnel.

Indexed as

ammunition techniciansdemolition residuesdinitrotolueneexplosive ordnance disposalexposomeoccupational exposuresource-pathway-receptor modeltrinitrotoluene

Identifiers

PMID42797731
PMCPMC13611739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.