ReviewToxics2026
Algal Toxins, Food Safety, and Bioterrorism: A Food and Water Defense Perspective.
Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food defense encompasses both the prevention of accidental contamination and the protection of food and water systems against deliberate adulteration. Within this framework, algal toxins deserve greater attention because they occupy a critical intersection of water security, seafood and drinking-water safety, environmental change, supply-chain continuity, and public health preparedness. The novelty of this review lies in reframing algal toxins from a primarily environmental, seafood safety, or clinical toxicology topic into an integrated food and water defense problem. This perspective brings together harmful algal bloom ecology, toxin toxicology, seafood safety, drinking-water protection, preparedness for intentional adulteration, climate change risk, surveillance, and emergency response. Algal toxins can enter the human supply chain through multiple marine and freshwater pathways, are often undetectable by taste, odor, or appearance, may resist routine preparation measures, and can generate high-consequence disruptions even when contamination begins locally. The analysis further shows that prevention depends largely on upstream measures-including environmental surveillance, harvest-area restrictions, source-water protection, testing, supply-chain controls, and rapid public communication-rather than on consumer behavior. Framed in the context of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Intentional Adulteration Rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act, this paper situates algal toxins within a preventive defense model that integrates monitoring, vulnerability reduction, and emergency preparedness. Although most harmful algal bloom events are naturally occurring, algal toxins warrant attention in food-defense planning because they can contaminate seafood and drinking-water systems, complicate detection and attribution, and expose vulnerabilities across interconnected food and water infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.