Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797683›Full record

ReviewToxics2026

Application and Mechanisms of Biochar in Anaerobic Digestion: Towards Process Resilience and Waste Valorization.

Yuan Shi, Yin Luo, Tingting Zhu, Kaijia Zang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan ShiFaculty of Digital-Intelligent Urban Construction & Creative Design, Wenhua College, Wuhan 430074, China.
Yin LuoFaculty of Digital-Intelligent Urban Construction & Creative Design, Wenhua College, Wuhan 430074, China.
Tingting ZhuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Kaijia ZangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 2025BEG2017Young Scientific and Technological Innovation Teams of Colleges and Universities in Hubei Province T2022053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is widely used for organic waste stabilization and bio-energy recovery, but its performance is often constrained by process instability, slow syntrophic metabolism, and sensitivity to acidification, ammonia, organic overloading, and inhibitory contaminants. Biochar has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance AD, with benefits extending beyond increased methane yield. This review examines how biochar properties, including pore structure, surface functional groups, alkalinity, and electrical conductivity, regulate different AD stages and improve process stability. Biochar provides microbial habitats, buffers pH, adsorbs inhibitors, accelerates volatile fatty acid conversion, and facilitates interspecies electron transfer. The effects of biochar dosage, feedstock type, reactor configuration, and operational conditions on digestion performance and resource recovery are critically evaluated. Broader contributions to organic waste valorization are also discussed. Future research should prioritize tailored biochar design, standardized characterization, long-term validation in continuous reactors, techno-economic analysis, and life-cycle assessment. These efforts are essential for translating laboratory findings into reliable and sustainable applications for organic solid waste treatment and resource recovery.

Indexed as

abiotic–biotic couplinganaerobic digestionbiochardirect interspecies electron transfer (DIET)resource valorization

Identifiers

PMID42797683
PMCPMC13611669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.