ArticleToxics2026
Ultraviolet Radiation in the Remediation of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Corn Stover.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation was selected in this study to evaluate its assistant remediation effects on Cr-contaminated soil. Various remediation materials, including corn stover (CS), corn stover biochar (CSB), polypyrrole-modified 44 corn stover (PPy-CS), and polypyrrole-modified corn stover biochar (PPy-CSB), were employed to evaluate their synergistic effects with UV radiation. The results showed that UV radiation increased the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) Cr(VI) when no other remediation was added to the contaminated soil. However, when the remediation materials were added, with UV radiation, the contents of TCLP-Cr(VI) decreased, while the contents of Cr(III) increased, and the removal rates of TCLP-Cr(VI) in contaminated soil treated by CSB, PPy-CSB, CS, and PPy-CS were 18.7%, 7.6%, 11.0%, and 8.2% higher than those of the non-irradiated groups, respectively. Notably, the CS group demonstrated superior efficacy in Cr(VI) removal compared with CSB under UV irradiation. Meanwhile, characteristic analysis including electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS) assisted us in finding reaction mechanisms, which implied that UV irradiation could enhance the content of oxygen free radicals on the material surface and effectively activate the reactions between Cr(VI) and remediation materials. This study verified that UV irradiation could also be a promising tool in the remediation of heavy-metal-contaminated soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.