Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797648›Full record

ReviewVaccines2026

New-Onset Pemphigus Following Drug Exposure and Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Reported Cases.

Gabriele Poddine, Francesco Bellinato, Paolo Gisondi, Giampiero Girolomoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriele PoddineSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Francesco BellinatoSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6163-6921
Paolo GisondiSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-9001
Giampiero GirolomoniSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-0493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough an increasing number of cases of new-onset pemphigus have been reported following drug exposure or vaccination, the available evidence remains fragmented and distinguishing true trigger-associated disease from coincidental onset continues to represent a major clinical challenge. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the available evidence on drug- and vaccine-associated new-onset pemphigus and to compare their clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261307622). PubMed was searched from database inception to 30 April 2026. Studies reporting individual patients with new-onset pemphigus temporally associated with drug exposure or vaccination were included. Demographic, clinical, immunopathological, therapeutic, and outcome data were extracted and synthesized descriptively because of the anticipated heterogeneity of the available evidence.

resultsA total of 20 drug-associated and 26 vaccine-associated cases identified from primary reports were included in the descriptive synthesis. Drug-associated cases demonstrated marked heterogeneity in the implicated agents, broader clinical variability, and a longer median latency, with frequent clinical improvement following withdrawal of the suspected drug when reported. In contrast, vaccine-associated cases occurred predominantly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, displayed a substantially shorter latency, and were mainly represented by pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Across both groups, systemic corticosteroids constituted the mainstay of treatment, with generally favorable outcomes among patients with available follow-up. However, the available evidence consisted almost exclusively of case reports and small case series, precluding reliable assessment of incidence or causality.

conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that drugs and vaccines may act as potential triggers of new-onset pemphigus in susceptible individuals; however, the strength of evidence differs substantially between the two settings. Drug-associated cases generally provide more convincing clinical support for a trigger-related mechanism, whereas vaccine-associated cases require more cautious interpretation because temporal association alone cannot establish causality. Standardized case reporting, prospective pharmacovigilance, and mechanistic studies are needed to strengthen causal inference and improve the recognition and management of trigger-associated pemphigus.

Indexed as

autoimmune blistering diseasesdrug-associated pemphiguspemphiguspharmacovigilancesystematic reviewvaccinationvaccine-associated pemphigus

Identifiers

PMID42797648
PMCPMC13611897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.