Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797604›Full record

ReviewVaccines2026

Can Microneedle-Nanocarrier Platforms Deliver True Tolerogenic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis?

Mingpeng Feng, Hong Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingpeng FengMedicine & Technology College, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0466-1695
Hong ZhouUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-591X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing skin disease driven by failed immune tolerance toward self-antigens and sustained IL-23/IL-17 signaling. Systemic drugs and biologics control disease in many patients, yet they do not restore lasting tolerance, and most patients relapse after treatment withdrawal. Tolerogenic vaccines aim to re-educate the cutaneous immune system: when administered under non-inflammatory conditions, they push antigen-presenting cells toward tolerogenic dendritic cells (tDCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) instead of pathogenic effectors. Because the hyperkeratotic stratum corneum of psoriatic plaques blocks macromolecular vaccines, microneedle (MN) arrays can deposit nanocarriers directly into the dermal-epidermal junction. The narrative review asks whether MN-delivered tolerogenic nanovaccines can advance psoriasis therapy beyond broad immunosuppression. We first define tolerogenic vaccination and explicitly distinguish antigen-specific tolerogenic vaccines, antigen-independent immune-reprogramming nanocarriers, and conventional local drug delivery, then survey MN engineering and nanocarrier architectures, the immunomodulatory pathways involved, and translational barriers spanning manufacturing, safety, and regulation. Because most evidence is preclinical, the level of evidence is reported for each platform, and the unresolved autoantigen problem, the limitations of imiquimod-based models, and the need for human-relevant validation are emphasized.

Indexed as

cutaneous immunomodulationIL-23/IL-17 axismicroneedlespsoriasisregulatory T cellstolerogenic vaccinestransdermal deliverytransdermal nanovaccines

Identifiers

PMID42797604
PMCPMC13611329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.