Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797546›Full record

ArticleVaccines2026

Vaccine Coadministration in Primary Care: A KAP Survey Among General Practitioners in Southern Italy.

Cesare De Virgilio Suglia, Maria Zamparella, Claudia Palmieri, Chiara Noviello, Pasquale Stefanizzi, Silvio Tafuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cesare De Virgilio SugliaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-6941-2752
Maria ZamparellaSIICP-Società Italiana Interdisciplinare per le Cure Primarie, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Claudia PalmieriInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Chiara NovielloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9787-5891
Pasquale StefanizziInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-0196
Silvio TafuriInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4194-0210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of vaccines recommended for adults and older people has increased in recent years, and same-visit coadministration represents a potential strategy to improve vaccination coverage and timeliness. However, its implementation in primary care may depend on general practitioners' (GPs) attitudes, vaccination experience, and organisational factors. This study investigated knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding vaccine coadministration among GPs in Apulia, Southern Italy.

methodsWe conducted an anonymous cross-sectional online survey between January and June 2026 among practicing GPs and general practice trainees working in outpatient primary care settings in Apulia. The questionnaire assessed vaccination activity, intended coadministration practices, perceived effects on vaccine effectiveness and coverage, safety in very old adults or patients with multimorbidity, and perceived barriers to vaccination. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with a positive perception of coadministration safety in very old or multimorbid patients. An additional sensitivity analysis excluded respondents reporting insufficient information to assess safety.

resultsA total of 256 physicians completed the survey; 71.1% were aged ≥50 years. Most respondents had administered adult vaccines during the previous year, and 68.0% were classified as high vaccinators, having administered three or more different vaccine types. Although 68.0% believed that coadministration could increase vaccination coverage, only 13.3% reported willingness to administer three or more vaccines during a single visit. Overall, 50.0% considered coadministration very or fairly safe in very old or multimorbid patients, 24.2% considered it slightly or not at all safe, and 25.8% reported insufficient information to assess its safety. In the fully adjusted model, high vaccination activity was associated with higher odds of a positive safety perception (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.70), whereas difficulties using vaccination IT platforms were associated with lower odds (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.86). Age ≥ 50 years was not independently associated with the outcome after adjustment (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-1.26).

conclusionsGPs in Apulia showed generally favorable attitudes toward vaccine coadministration, although substantial uncertainty remained regarding its use in very old and multimorbid patients. Confidence in coadministration was primarily associated with greater vaccination activity and fewer difficulties with vaccination IT platforms, whereas age-related differences observed in bivariate analyses were attenuated after multivariable adjustment. Educational, organisational, and digital-support interventions may facilitate broader implementation of same-visit adult vaccination in primary care.

Indexed as

adult vaccinationfamily medicineprimary caresocial determinantsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID42797546
PMCPMC13611679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.