Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42797545›Full record

ArticleVaccines2026

Formulation and Investigation of the In Vitro Immunostimulatory Potential of Microparticulate Guanine-α-D-Fructose in Vaccine Candidates.

Yashkumar Harsoda, Mahek Gulani, Snehitha Akkineni, Aditi Satoskar, Amarae Ferguson, Tanisha Manoj Arte, Mohammad N Uddin, Christiane Chbib, Martin J D'Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yashkumar HarsodaVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-895X
Mahek GulaniVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Snehitha AkkineniVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6584-2678
Aditi SatoskarVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1973-1036
Amarae FergusonVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Tanisha Manoj ArteVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-6181-8517
Mohammad N UddinVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-6544
Christiane ChbibDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine (NSU-MD), Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.
Martin J D'SouzaVaccine Nanotechnology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Delivery Research, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesParticulate vaccine formulations require delivery systems and immunostimulatory components that support antigen-presenting cell interaction while maintaining formulation stability and cytocompatibility. This study examines Guanine-α-D-Fructose (GDF), a guanine-fructose small-molecule immunostimulatory candidate, incorporated into poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles and benchmarked in vitro against established adjuvant formulations containing Alum or AddaVax.

methodsGDF-loaded microparticles were prepared and characterized for particle size, morphology, surface charge, entrapment efficiency, and release behavior. Their in vitro immunostimulatory activity was evaluated using murine dendritic cells. To explore formulation compatibility, GDF MPs were tested in combination with multiple particulate antigen formulations, including measles, gonorrhea, SARS-CoV-2, influenza A (H3N2), and Zika. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was utilized to measure cell viability, while nitric oxide generation was measured with the Griess assay. Dendritic cell activation-associated surface marker expression was analyzed by flow cytometry using MHC I, MHC II, CD80, and CD40.

resultsThe particles showed consistent spherical morphology, sustained GDF release, and favorable cytocompatibility at concentrations up to 250 µg/mL, with reduced viability at higher concentrations. GDF MPs increased nitric oxide production and activation-associated marker expression, with responses benchmarked against Alum and AddaVax and comparable in several assay conditions. Increased autophagosome-associated fluorescence was also observed, suggesting modulation of autophagy-related cellular activity; however, direct antigen-processing or antigen-presentation assays are still required.

conclusionsOverall, these findings support GDF-loaded PLGA microparticles as an in vitro immunostimulatory particulate formulation suitable for further mechanistic and in vivo evaluation in vaccine-related systems.

Indexed as

flow cytometryGuanine-α-D-Fructoseimmunostimulatory compoundMHC IMHC IIPLGA microparticlesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID42797545
PMCPMC13611338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.